Re: pg_get__*_ddl consolidation
| От | Álvaro Herrera |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_get__*_ddl consolidation |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 202603201311.yhtqmvektawm@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | pg_get__*_ddl consolidation (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_get__*_ddl consolidation
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2026-Mar-19, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Greetings > > Euler Taveira and I have been working on consolidating these patches. Hmm, did you remove the permissions checking to dump objects? I thought we had concluded that these were needed -- ie. you have to have at least CONNECT to a database to be able to dump it, and so on. This way, the functions do not override a DBAs intention to hide the information, when they run REVOKE on the catalogs. I know this is a nonstandard thing to do, but some people do it nonetheless. https://postgr.es/m/202511131446.uzn4c25ljmd4@alvherre.pgsql -- Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "Computing is too important to be left to men." (Karen Spärck Jones)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: