Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]

On 2026-Jan-05, Antonin Houska wrote:

> Mihail Nikalayeu <mihailnikalayeu@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Probably it is because
> > > 100000L,    /* XXX Tune the delay. */
> > 
> > 100 seconds is clearly too much.
> 
> I confused milliseconds with microseconds. Since I was only running the code
> with debugger, the long delays didn't appear to be a problem.
> 
> Instead of tuning the timeout, I'm thinking of introducing a condition
> variable that signals WAL flushing.

I think there is a patch that adds support for this in the queue already
-- see this message:
https://postgr.es/m/CAPpHfds-KiZRuCruc0jHxLSxLqzKcHJGwOFFA0b_RgaJvtUOEQ@mail.gmail.com

-- 
Álvaro Herrera         PostgreSQL Developer  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"¿Qué importan los años?  Lo que realmente importa es comprobar que
a fin de cuentas la mejor edad de la vida es estar vivo"  (Mafalda)