Re: headerscheck ccache support
| От | Álvaro Herrera |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: headerscheck ccache support |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 202511281342.nx2cxkvcvtwc@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: headerscheck ccache support (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2025-Nov-28, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > But this doesn't seem to buy very much. The overhead of the shell script to > write out the test files appears to become significant compared the the > actual compile commands. If you wanted to save some shell execution time, you could move the `tr` calls to the bottom of the loop to avoid doing it for files that the `if` block is going to discard. But is that significant? I doubt it. (I didn't quite understand why you use printf instead of echo, given that both are shell builtins in any case.) I think parallelism is also going to win in the case where the compiles are not cached. -- Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: