Re: Consistently use the XLogRecPtrIsInvalid() macro
| От | Álvaro Herrera |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Consistently use the XLogRecPtrIsInvalid() macro |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 202510311047.5wm5fp2t23we@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Consistently use the XLogRecPtrIsInvalid() macro (Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Consistently use the XLogRecPtrIsInvalid() macro
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2025-Oct-31, Bertrand Drouvot wrote: > After giving it more thought, I'm inclined to postpone the compiler warning > until XLogRecPtrIsValid() has been available for some time. The question is for > how long? Maybe we can mark it so that it becomes obsolete in a future version, #if PG_VERSION_NUM >= 210000 [[obsolete]] #endif XLogRecPtrIsInvalid( .. ) so that people using it today won't get any noise, but once they do get the warning, the versions without the other macro are already out of support, so they can switch to the new one easily. (This presupposes that we'd add the new macro to older branches as well, which shouldn't be a problem.) Only extensions wishing to support PG versions older than we support would have to work slightly harder, but that should be OK. -- Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "I dream about dreams about dreams", sang the nightingale under the pale moon (Sandman)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: