Re: BUG #18960: Mistake in test test_simple_pipeline (libpq_pipeline.c)

On 2025-Jun-21, Tom Lane wrote:

> Here's a shot at improving matters.  I also made an effort
> at cleaning up memory leaks in libpq_pipeline.c, although
> that's surely neatnik-ism not anything meaningful.

Yeah, the code looks much better this way.  I thought it was a bit odd
that a function called confirm_result_status() would actually consume
said status.  Would it be better as
  consume_result_status(PGconn *conn, ExecStatusType expected)
?

I think the patch is a clear improvement regardless.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera         PostgreSQL Developer  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"World domination is proceeding according to plan"        (Andrew Morton)