Re: Test instability when pg_dump orders by OID
От | Noah Misch |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Test instability when pg_dump orders by OID |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20250820172156.be.nmisch@google.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Test instability when pg_dump orders by OID (Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 10:11:15AM +0500, Kirill Reshke wrote: > On Sun, 10 Aug 2025 at 21:37, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote: > > Thanks. Given the current state of freeze for tomorrow's release wrap, the > > decision is less obvious than usual. I'm seeing these options: > > > > 1. Remove the new assertion in v13-v18. > > 2. Push your proposed fix. > > 3. Change nothing. (This would be the choice if one is maximally concerned > > about deviating from the freeze and unconcerned about --enable-cassert > > builds of releases.) > > > > I am inclined to make today's change be (1). A fresh audit of catalog PRIMARY > > KEY and UNIQUE constraints didn't find any more missed cases, but (1) still > > feels like the right level of cautiousness. If there are no objections in the > > next 3hr, I'll proceed with (1). > > Hi! I can see we have option (1) (28e7252 etc). Can we now move > forward with option (2) for HEAD? Yep. It's in my queue.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: