Re: relrewrite not documented at the top of heap_create_with_catalog()
От | Yugo Nagata |
---|---|
Тема | Re: relrewrite not documented at the top of heap_create_with_catalog() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20250616223743.413cc7dcdc967a5d16f08631@sraoss.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 16 Jun 2025 16:51:46 +0800 Steven Niu <niushiji@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, Michael, > > The change looks good to me. > > I made more change based on your patch to combine the old comment. I think it's a good idea to move the description of heap_create_with_catalog directly above the function itself, as it seems better to keep the explanation close to the function definition rather than placing it before related functions. A similar change was made to heap_drop_with_catalog in commit 49ce6fff1d34. I'm not sure whether this should be merged into the original patch, though. I have a very minor comment on the initial patch. + * relrewrite: link to original relation during a table rewrite. I wonder if the period at the end is unnecessary, since this is not a full sentence, and for consistency with the other lines. Best regards, Yugo Nagata > Regards, > Steven > > Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> 于2025年6月16日周一 14:49写道: > > > Hi all, > > > > While looking at the heap code, I've found that relrewrite, parameter > > used a trick to keep a link to the original relation rewritten, is not > > documented at the top of heap_create_with_catalog() contrary to all > > its other parameters. > > > > A simple patch is attached to document that. > > > > Thanks, > > -- > > Michael > > -- Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: