Re: datfrozenxid > relfrozenxid w/ crash before XLOG_HEAP_INPLACE
От | Noah Misch |
---|---|
Тема | Re: datfrozenxid > relfrozenxid w/ crash before XLOG_HEAP_INPLACE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20250413203758.ef.nmisch@google.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: datfrozenxid > relfrozenxid w/ crash before XLOG_HEAP_INPLACE (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Apr 06, 2025 at 11:00:54AM -0700, Noah Misch wrote: > I pushed that as commit 8e7e672 (2024-10-25). I now think DELAY_CHKPT_START > is superfluous here, per this proc.h comment: > > * (In the > * extremely common case where the data being modified is in shared buffers > * and we acquire an exclusive content lock on the relevant buffers before > * writing WAL, this mechanism is not needed, because phase 2 will block > * until we release the content lock and then flush the modified data to > * disk.) > > heap_inplace_update_and_unlock() meets those conditions. Its closest > precedent is XLogSaveBufferForHint(), which does need DELAY_CHKPT_START due to > having only BUFFER_LOCK_SHARED. True so far, but ... > heap_inplace_update_and_unlock() has > BUFFER_LOCK_EXCLUSIVE, so it doesn't need DELAY_CHKPT_START. ... not so, because we've not yet done MarkBufferDirty(). transam/README cites SyncOneBuffer(), which says: * Check whether buffer needs writing. * * We can make this check without taking the buffer content lock so long * as we mark pages dirty in access methods *before* logging changes with * XLogInsert(): if someone marks the buffer dirty just after our check we * don't worry because our checkpoint.redo points before log record for * upcoming changes and so we are not required to write such dirty buffer. The attached patch updates the aforementioned proc.h comment and the heap_inplace_update_and_unlock() comment that my last message proposed.
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: