Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 202504030820.sbjctyu72jrx@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression
Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2025-Apr-03, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: > Looks like the problem is in the test itself as pointed out by Jeff in > [1]. PFA patch fixing the test and enabling statistics back. Thanks, pushed. > A note about variable name changes and introduction of new variables. > We run step 2 between 1 and 3 so that autovacuum gets a chance to run > on the old cluster and update statistics. Autovacuum run is not > necessary but useful here. Before these changes all the cluster > initializations were using the same variables @initdb_params and > %node_params. However with these changes, we modify the variable in > step 2 and then again require original values in step 4. So I have > used two sets of variables prefixed with old_ and new_ for clusters > created in 1st step and 2nd step respectively. 4th step uses the > variables with prefix old_. I think this change eliminates confusion > caused by using same variables with different values. This was a good change, thanks. -- Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "No es bueno caminar con un hombre muerto"
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: