Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression

On 2025-Mar-31, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:

> Given where we are in the cycle, it seems to make sense to stick to using the
> schedule we already have rather than invent a new process for generating it,
> and work on that for 19?

No objections to that.  I'll see about getting this committed during my
morning today, so that I have plenty of time to watch the buildfarm.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera         PostgreSQL Developer  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
 Are you not unsure you want to delete Firefox?
       [Not unsure]     [Not not unsure]    [Cancel]
                   http://smylers.hates-software.com/2008/01/03/566e45b2.html