Re: NOT ENFORCED constraint feature

On 2025-Feb-18, Amul Sul wrote:

> The patch looks quite reasonable, but I’m concerned that renaming
> ATExecAlterConstrRecurse() and ATExecAlterChildConstr() exclusively
> for deferrability might require the enforceability patch to duplicate
> these functions, even though some operations (e.g., pg_constraint
> updates and recursion on child constraints) could have been reused.

True.  I'll give another look to your 0008 and Suraj's patch for
inheritability change, to avoid repetitive boilerplate as much as
possible.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera               48°01'N 7°57'E  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/