Re: [pgsql-advocacy] MySQL to PostgreSQL, was ENUM type

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [pgsql-advocacy] MySQL to PostgreSQL, was ENUM type
Дата
Msg-id 20242.1122526387@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [pgsql-advocacy] MySQL to PostgreSQL, was ENUM type  (Gregory Youngblood <pgcluster@netio.org>)
Ответы Re: [pgsql-advocacy] MySQL to PostgreSQL, was ENUM type  (Gregory Youngblood <pgcluster@netio.org>)
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] MySQL to PostgreSQL, was ENUM type  (Kenneth Marshall <ktm@it.is.rice.edu>)
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] MySQL to PostgreSQL, was ENUM type  ("Jim C. Nasby" <decibel@decibel.org>)
Список pgsql-general
Дерево обсуждения 
Gregory Youngblood <pgcluster@netio.org> writes:
> ... the problem is unsigned bigint in mysql to postgresql.
> There's not another larger integer size that can be used that would
> allow the 18446744073709551615 (is that the max value?) max value
> available in mysql. Or am I missing something?

You'd have to translate that to NUMERIC, which would work but would
take a bit of a performance hit ...

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Chris Travers
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] MySQL to PostgreSQL, was ENUM type
Следующее
От: Gregory Youngblood
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] MySQL to PostgreSQL, was ENUM type