Re: Proposal: add new API to stringinfo

Michael said:
> New APIs are materials for HEAD, so recompilation needs to happen
> anyway.  Using a macro makes things slightly simpler and it would not
> break unnecessarily the compilation of existing extensions.

Ok.

David said:
> I didn't review the patch in detail, but I think "initsize" would be a
> better parameter name than "size".

Ok, will change to "initsize".

With opinions from Michael and David , what about following additional APIs?

#define STRINGINFO_DEFAULT_SIZE    1024    /* default initial allocation size */
#define STRINGINFO_SMALL_SIZE    64    /* small initial allocation size */

#define makeStringInfo        makeStringInfoExtended(STRINGINFO_DEFAULT_SIZE)
#define    initStringInfo(str)    initStringInfoExtended(str, STRINGINFO_DEFAULT_SIZE)

extern StringInfo makeStringInfoExtended(int initsize);
extern void initStringInfoExtended(StringInfo str, int initsize);

Best reagards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS K.K.
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en/
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp