Re: coverage.postgresql.org doesn't run injection_point tests

Hi Peter

On 2024-Nov-10, Peter Geoghegan wrote:

> The purpose of injection_points is to get test coverage for areas that
> would otherwise be almost impossible to ensure coverage of due to
> concurrency or timing issues. It would be useful if
> coverage.postgresql.org was made to build Postgres with support for
> injection_points, so that the relevant TAP tests actually ran and were
> counted by community coverage reports. That way we'd have a more
> complete picture of the test coverage situation.

Thanks for pointing it out.  I have enabled the configure option, and
looking at the report for transam/multixact.c, they are being exercised.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera        Breisgau, Deutschland  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"At least to kernel hackers, who really are human, despite occasional
rumors to the contrary" (LWN.net)