Re: documentation structure

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tatsuo Ishii
Тема Re: documentation structure
Дата
Msg-id 20240720.094717.1695122772235543142.ishii@postgresql.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: documentation structure  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: documentation structure
Список pgsql-hackers
>> IMO the file name should match the ID of the sect1 element with the leading
>> "functions-" removed, naming the directory "functions".  Thus when viewing
>> the web page the corresponding sgml file is determinable.
> 
> I'd go for shorter myself (ie "func/"), mainly due to the precedent
> of the existing subdirectory which is "ref/" not "reference/".
> It's hardly a big deal though.

I don't have strong preference neither but I agree that "func/" is
more consistent with existing subdirectory names.

Best reagards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS LLC
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en/
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Paul George
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: behavior of GROUP BY with VOLATILE expressions
Следующее
От: "David G. Johnston"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: documentation structure