Re: Confine vacuum skip logic to lazy_scan_skip

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Noah Misch
Тема Re: Confine vacuum skip logic to lazy_scan_skip
Дата
Msg-id 20240707144944.58.nmisch@google.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Confine vacuum skip logic to lazy_scan_skip  (Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Confine vacuum skip logic to lazy_scan_skip
Re: Confine vacuum skip logic to lazy_scan_skip
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 05:36:25PM -0400, Melanie Plageman wrote:
> I've attached a WIP v11 streaming vacuum patch set here that is
> rebased over master (by Thomas), so that I could add a CF entry for
> it. It still has the problem with the extra WAL write and fsync calls
> investigated by Thomas above. Thomas has some work in progress doing
> streaming write-behind to alleviate the issues with the buffer access
> strategy and streaming reads. When he gets a version of that ready to
> share, he will start a new "Streaming Vacuum" thread.

To avoid reviewing the wrong patch, I'm writing to verify the status here.
This is Needs Review in the commitfest.  I think one of these two holds:

1. Needs Review is valid.
2. It's actually Waiting on Author.  You're commissioning a review of the
   future-thread patch, not this one.

If it's (1), given the WIP marking, what is the scope of the review you seek?
I'm guessing performance is out of scope; what else is in or out of scope?



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Joel Jacobson"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Incorrect results from numeric round() and trunc()
Следующее
От: Fujii Masao
Дата:
Сообщение: pg_maintain and USAGE privilege on schema