Re: BUG #18377: Assert false in "partdesc->nparts >= pinfo->nparts", fileName="execPartition.c", lineNumber=1943
| От | Alvaro Herrera |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: BUG #18377: Assert false in "partdesc->nparts >= pinfo->nparts", fileName="execPartition.c", lineNumber=1943 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 202406241517.ugtdq7tokfnx@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: BUG #18377: Assert false in "partdesc->nparts >= pinfo->nparts", fileName="execPartition.c", lineNumber=1943 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: BUG #18377: Assert false in "partdesc->nparts >= pinfo->nparts", fileName="execPartition.c", lineNumber=1943
|
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
On 2024-Jun-24, Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes: > > Thanks for looking again. I have finally pushed this. > > Um ... you are aware that we are in beta2 release freeze, no? Sigh. No, I missed that. I'm going to revert it now, because I see that skink failed. I don't see how my patch is to blame since it's a timeout and we have no logs for the failure; but maybe my patch did make something slower and caused some test to go over the time limit. I'd revert from master only though, to avoid noise in the other branches that aren't in commit freeze and there are no BF failures. Any hard votes against doing that? -- Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "Postgres is bloatware by design: it was built to house PhD theses." (Joey Hellerstein, SIGMOD annual conference 2002)
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: