Sorry to interject, but --
On 2024-May-15, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> It looks like with the use of the new multi insert table access method
> (TAM) for COPY (v20-0005), pgbench regressed about 35% [1].
Where does this acronym "TAM" comes from for "table access method"? I
find it thoroughly horrible and wish we didn't use it. What's wrong
with using "table AM"? It's not that much longer, much clearer and
reuses our well-established acronym AM.
We don't use IAM anywhere, for example (it's always "index AM"), and I
don't think we'd turn "sequence AM" into SAM either, would we?
--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/