Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects
| От | Nathan Bossart |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20240327150826.GB3994937@nathanxps13 обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 10:54:05AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net> writes: >> What is the status of this? In the commitfest, this patch is marked as >> "Needs Review" with Nathan as reviewer - Nathan, were you going to take >> another look at this or was your mail from January 12th a full review? > > In my mind the ball is in Nathan's court. I feel it's about > committable, but he might not agree. I'll prioritize another round of review on this one. FWIW I don't remember having any major concerns on a previous version of the patch set I looked at. -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: