On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 04:49:12PM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 12:25:37PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> In the same vein, I think deactivated_at or inactive_since might be
>> good names to consider. I think they get at the same thing as
>> released_time, but they avoid introducing a completely new word
>> (release, as opposed to active/inactive).
>
> Yeah, I'd vote for inactive_since then.
Having only skimmed some of the related discussions, I'm inclined to agree
that inactive_since provides the clearest description for the column.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com