Re: documentation structure

On 2024-Mar-21, Robert Haas wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 9:38 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > I'd follow the extend.sgml precedent: have a file corresponding to the
> > chapter and containing any top-level text we need, then that includes
> > a file per sect1.
> 
> OK, here's a new patch set. I've revised 0003 and 0004 to use this
> approach, 

Great, thanks.  Looking at the index in the PDF after (only) 0003, we
now have this structure

62. Table Access Method Interface Definition ....................................................... 2475
63. Index Access Method Interface Definition ....................................................... 2476
63.1. Basic API Structure for Indexes .......................................................... 2476
63.2. Index Access Method Functions .......................................................... 2479
63.3. Index Scanning ................................................................................ 2485
63.4. Index Locking Considerations ............................................................. 2486
63.5. Index Uniqueness Checks .................................................................. 2487
63.6. Index Cost Estimation Functions ......................................................... 2489
64. Generic WAL Records ................................................................................. 2492
65. Custom WAL Resource Managers ................................................................. 2494
66. Built-in Index Access Methods ...................................................................... 2496

which is a bit odd: why are the two WAL chapters in the middle of the
chapters 62 and 63 talking about AMs?  Maybe put 66 right after 63
instead.    Also, is it really better to have 62/63 first and 66
later?  It sounds to me like 66 is more user-oriented and the other two
are developer-oriented, so I'm inclined to suggest putting them the
other way around, but I'm not really sure about this.  (Also, starting
chapter 66 straight with 66.1 BTree without any intro text looks a bit
odd; maybe one short introductory paragraph is sufficient?)

> and I've added a new 0005 that does essentially the same
> thing for the PL chapters.

I was looking at the PL chapters earlier today too, wondering whether
this would be valuable; but I worry that there are too many
sub-sub-sections there, so it could end up being a bit messy.  I didn't
look at the resulting output though.

> 0001 and 0002 are [un]changed. Should 0002 use the include-an-entity
> approach as well?

Shrug, I wouldn't, doesn't look worth it.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera               48°01'N 7°57'E  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"No es bueno caminar con un hombre muerto"