Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
| От | Nathan Bossart |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20240301221108.GB3024365@nathanxps13 обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 08:10:00PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote: > I'm thinking the other way around - how about we revert > https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=007693f2a3ac2ac19affcb03ad43cdb36ccff5b5, > that is, put in place "conflict" as a boolean and introduce > invalidation_reason the text form. So, for logical slots, whenever the > "conflict" column is true, the reason is found in invaldiation_reason > column? How does it sound? Again the debate might be "conflict" vs > "invalidation", but that looks clean IMHO. Would you ever see "conflict" as false and "invalidation_reason" as non-null for a logical slot? -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: