Re: src/bin/pg_upgrade/t/004_subscription.pl test comment fix
| От | Alvaro Herrera |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: src/bin/pg_upgrade/t/004_subscription.pl test comment fix |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 202401310848.d6jovn6426uo@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение |
| Ответ на | src/bin/pg_upgrade/t/004_subscription.pl test comment fix (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: src/bin/pg_upgrade/t/004_subscription.pl test comment fix
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
How about rewording it more extensively? It doesn't read great IMO. I would use something like # In the upgraded instance, the running status and failover option of the # subscription with the failover option should have been preserved; the other # should not. # So regress_sub1 should still have subenabled,subfailover set to true, # while regress_sub2 should have both set to false. I think the symmetry between the two lines confuses more than helps. It's not a huge thing but since we're editing anyway, why not? -- Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "The saddest aspect of life right now is that science gathers knowledge faster than society gathers wisdom." (Isaac Asimov)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: