Hi,
On 2024-01-19 12:28:05 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 03:42:28PM +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> > Given that commit 728f86fec6 that introduced this issue was not strictly
> > required, perhaps we should just revert it for v16.
>
> Is there a point in keeping 728f86fec6 as well on HEAD? That does not
> strike me as wise to keep that in the tree for now. If it needs to be
> reworked, looking at this problem from scratch would be a safer
> approach.
IDK, I think we'll introduce this type of bug over and over if we don't fix it
properly.
Greetings,
Andres Freund