Re: retire MemoryContextResetAndDeleteChildren backwards compatibility macro
| От | Nathan Bossart |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: retire MemoryContextResetAndDeleteChildren backwards compatibility macro |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20231114175917.GC2062604@nathanxps13 обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: retire MemoryContextResetAndDeleteChildren backwards compatibility macro (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: retire MemoryContextResetAndDeleteChildren backwards compatibility macro
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 12:10:41PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > FWIW, I think it's fine to just nuke MemoryContextResetAndDeleteChildren. > We ask extension authors to deal with much more significant API changes > than that in every release, and versions where the updated code wouldn't > work are long gone. And, as you say, the existence of that separate from > MemoryContextReset creates confusion, which has nonzero cost in itself. That is my preference as well. Alvaro, AFAICT you are the only vote against removing it completely. If you feel ѕtrongly about it, I don't mind going the __attribute__((deprecated)) route, but otherwise, I'd probably just remove it completely. -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: