Re: GUC names in messages
От | Nathan Bossart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: GUC names in messages |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20231102015239.GA82553@nathanxps13 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: GUC names in messages (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>) |
Ответы |
Re: GUC names in messages
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 09:46:52PM +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote: > I agree for names with underscores in them. But I think that quoting > is necessary for names like "timezone" or "datestyle" that might be > mistaken for normal words. My personal preference is to always quote > GUC names, but I think it is OK not to quote GOCs whose name are > clearly not natural language words. +1, IMHO quoting GUC names makes it abundantly clear that they are special identifiers. In de4d456, we quoted the role names in a bunch of messages. We didn't quote the attribute/option names, but those are in all-caps, so they already stand out nicely. -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: