On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 10:46:47AM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> Committed and back-patched.
... and it looks like some of the back-branches are failing for Windows.
I'm assuming this is because c290e79 was only back-patched to v15. My
first instinct is just to back-patch that one all the way to v11, but maybe
there's an alternative involving #ifdef WIN32. Are there any concerns with
back-patching c290e79?
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com