On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 07:45:21PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> writes:
> > ... This fix makes interval_ops simply omit the support function,
> > like numeric_ops does. Back-pack to v13, where btequalimage() first
> > appeared. In back branches, for the benefit of old catalog content,
> > btequalimage() code will return false for type "interval". Going
> > forward, back-branch initdb will include the catalog change.
>
> Hmm, I'm not sure that that last is a good idea. The upshot of this
> (because of the opr_sanity.out change) is that "make installcheck"
> will fail against existing back-branch installations. That seems
> more likely to cause problems/confusion than the alternative of just
> depending on the code change.
I'm way more worried about amcheck failing on all those indexes than I am
about someone who needs to tweak their installcheck rig. I accepted the
former as the least-bad option, but if any area needs more thought, I feel
that's the area.