Re: stopgap fix for signal handling during restore_command

On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 09:54:18PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 04:40:28PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
>> I'd make these elog(PANIC), I think. The paths are not performance critical
>> enough that a single branch hurts, so the overhead of the check is irrelevant,
>> and the consequences of calling ProcKill() twice for the same process are very
>> severe.
> 
> Right.  Should we write_stderr_signal_safe() and then abort() to keep these
> paths async-signal-safe?

Hm.  I see that elog() is called elsewhere in proc_exit(), and it does not
appear to be async-signal-safe.  Am I missing something?

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com