Re: bug fix and documentation improvement about vacuumdb

On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 10:13:10AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> On 15 Sep 2023, at 04:39, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote:
>> It seems to work fine. However, if we're aiming for consistent
>> spacing, the "IS NULL" (two spaces in between) might be an concern.
> 
> I don't think that's a problem.  I would rather have readable C code and two
> spaces in the generated SQL than contorting the C code to produce less
> whitespace in a query few will read in its generated form.

I think we could pretty easily avoid the extra space and keep the C code
relatively readable.  These sorts of things bug me, too (see 2af3336).

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com