At Wed, 13 Sep 2023 23:48:30 -0700, Krishnakumar R <kksrcv001@gmail.com> wrote in
> Please find a small patch to improve code readability by fixing up the
> variable name to indicate the WAL record reservation status. The
> insertion is done later in the code based on the reservation status.
IMHO... Although "reserved" might be pertinent at the point of
assignment, its applicability promptly diminishes in the subsequent
uses. When the variable is first assigned, we know the record will
insert some bytes and advance the LSN. In other words, the variable
suggests "to be inserted", and promptly thereafter, the variable
indicates that the record "has been inserted". Given this, "inserted"
seems to be a better fit than "reserved".
In short, I would keep the variable name as it is.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center