Hi,
On 2023-08-23 10:10:31 +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 23 Aug 2023, at 03:17, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > On 2023-08-22 23:47:24 +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>
> >> My only small gripe is that I keep thinking about template databases for CREATE
> >> DATABASE when reading the error messages in this patch, which is clearly not
> >> related to what this does.
> >>
> >> + note("initializing database system by copying initdb template");
> >>
> >> I personally would've used cache instead of template in the user facing parts
> >> to keep concepts separated, but thats personal taste.
> >
> > I am going back and forth on that one (as one can notice with $subject). It
> > doesn't quite seem like a cache, as it's not "created" on demand and only
> > usable when the exactly same parameters are used repeatedly. But template is
> > overloaded as you say...
>
> That's a fair point, cache is not a good word to describe a stored copy of
> something prefabricated. Let's go with template, we can always refine in-tree
> if a better wording comes along.
Cool. Pushed that way. Only change I made is to redirect the output of cp
(and/or robocopy) in pg_regress, similar to how that was done for initdb
proper.
Let's see what the buildfarm says - it's not inconceivable that it'll show
some issues.
Greetings,
Andres Freund