Hello,
On 2023-Aug-12, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2023-08-08 12:45:05 +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> > > Any chance you could your benchmark? I don't see as much of a regression vs 16
> > > as you...
> >
> > Sure. The results are promising for me too:
> >
> > nclients = 1, execution time = 13.743
> > nclients = 2, execution time = 7.552
> > nclients = 4, execution time = 4.758
> > nclients = 8, execution time = 3.035
> > nclients = 16, execution time = 2.172
> > nclients = 32, execution time = 1.959
> > nclients = 64, execution time = 1.819
> > nclients = 128, execution time = 1.583
> > nclients = 256, execution time = 1.631
>
> Nice. We are consistently better than both 15 and "post integer parsing 16".
Since the wins from this patch were replicated and it has been pushed, I
understand that this open item can be marked as closed, so I've done
that.
Thanks,
--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Hay dos momentos en la vida de un hombre en los que no debería
especular: cuando puede permitírselo y cuando no puede" (Mark Twain)