Re: Obsolete reference to pg_relation in comment
От | Nathan Bossart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Obsolete reference to pg_relation in comment |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20230726185306.GB3310393@nathanxps13 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Obsolete reference to pg_relation in comment (Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari@ilmari.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Obsolete reference to pg_relation in comment
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 06:48:51PM +0100, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote: > Triggered by a discussion on IRC, I noticed that there's a stray > reference to pg_relation in a comment that was added long after it was > renamed to pg_class. Here's a patch to bring that up to speed. > pg_relation was renamed to pg_class in 1991, but this comment (added > in 2004) missed the memo Huh, interesting! I dug around the Berkeley archives [0] and found comments indicating that pg_relation was renamed to pg_class in Februrary 1990. However, it looks like the file was named pg_relation.h until Postgres95 v0.01, which has the following comment in pg_class.h: * ``pg_relation'' is being replaced by ``pg_class''. currently * we are only changing the name in the catalogs but someday the * code will be changed too. -cim 2/26/90 * [it finally happens. -ay 11/5/94] [0] https://dsf.berkeley.edu/postgres.html -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: