On 2023-Jul-05, Amit Kapila wrote:
> I think after returning "???" from logicalrep_message_type(), the
> above is possible when we get the error: "invalid logical replication
> message type "X"" from apply_dispatch(), right? If so, then what about
> the case when we forgot to handle some message in
> logicalrep_message_type() but handled it in apply_dispatch()? Isn't it
> better to return the 'action' from the function
> logicalrep_message_type() for unknown type? That way the information
> could be a bit better and we can easily catch the code bug as well.
Are you suggesting that logicalrep_message_type should include the
numerical value of 'action' in the ??? message? Something like this:
ERROR: invalid logical replication message type "X"
CONTEXT: processing remote data for replication origin "pg_16638" during message type "??? (123)" in transaction 796,
finishedat 0/16266F8
I don't see why not -- seems easy enough, and might help somebody.
--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
Tom: There seems to be something broken here.
Teodor: I'm in sackcloth and ashes... Fixed.
http://postgr.es/m/482D1632.8010507@sigaev.ru