Re: add non-option reordering to in-tree getopt_long

On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 02:12:44PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> The argv elements get shuffled around many times with the
> patch. However, I couldn't find a way to decrease the count without
> resorting to a forward scan.  So I've concluded the current approach
> is them most effeicient, considering the complexity.

Yeah, I'm not sure it's worth doing anything more sophisticated.

> I tried some patterns with the patch and it generates the same results
> with the glibc version.
> 
> The TAP test looks fine and it catches the change.
> 
> Everything looks fine to me.

Thanks for reviewing.

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com