Re: BUG #17903: There is a bug in the KeepLogSeg()
| От | Nathan Bossart |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: BUG #17903: There is a bug in the KeepLogSeg() |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20230421214347.GA1441786@nathanxps13 обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: BUG #17903: There is a bug in the KeepLogSeg() (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: BUG #17903: There is a bug in the KeepLogSeg()
|
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 10:42:31AM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> From what I understand, the XLogSegNo calculations are designed
> without considering the actual value range. Basically, it assumes that
> (XLogSegNo + <any positive int>) can overflow. If we take the actual
> value range into account, we can make that change.
>
> The choice lies on whether we assume the actual value range or not.
Yeah, after staring at this some more, I think your proposed fix is the way
to go. Alternatively, we could adjust the conditional for the
max_slot_wal_keep_size block to
if (keep != InvalidXLogRecPtr && keep < recptr)
but AFAICT that yields the exact same behavior.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: