Hi,
On 2023-04-10 08:14:18 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2023 at 12:01:17PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Why would it mean that? Parallel workers are updated together with the leader,
> > so there's no compatibility issue?
>
> My point is that the callback system would still need to be maintained
> in a stable branch, and, while useful, it could be used for much more
> than it is originally written. I guess that this could be used in
> custom nodes with their own custom parallel nodes.
Hm, I'm somewhat doubtful that that's something we should encourage. And
doubtful we'd get it right without a concrete use case at hand to verify the
design.
Greetings,
Andres Freund