Hi,
On 2023-03-20 10:37:36 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I agree that attinhcount could be narrowed, but I have some concern
> about attstattarget. IIRC, the limit on attstattarget was once 1000
> and then we raised it to 10000. Is it inconceivable that we might
> want to raise it to 100000 someday?
Hard to believe that'd happen in a minor version - and I don't think there'd
an issue with widening it again in a major version?
I doubt we'll ever go to 100k without a major redesign of stats storage/access
- the size of the stats datums would make that pretty impractical right now.
Greetings,
Andres Freund