Re: add PROCESS_MAIN to VACUUM
| От | Nathan Bossart | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: add PROCESS_MAIN to VACUUM | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20230307005949.GA3266981@nathanxps13 обсуждение исходный текст  | 
		
| Ответ на | Re: add PROCESS_MAIN to VACUUM (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) | 
| Ответы | 
                	
            		Re: add PROCESS_MAIN to VACUUM
            		
            		 | 
		
| Список | pgsql-hackers | 
On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 09:20:12AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> -    * Do the actual work --- either FULL or "lazy" vacuum
> +    * If PROCESS_MAIN is set (the default), it's time to vacuum the main
> +    * relation.  Otherwise, we can skip this part.  If required, we'll process
> +    * the TOAST table later.
> 
> Should we mention that this part could be used for a toast table once
> we've already looped once through vacuum_rel() when toast_relid was
> set?  VACOPT_PROCESS_MAIN is enforced a few lines down the road,
> still..
That did cross my mind, but I was worried that trying to explain all that
here could cause confusion.
    If PROCESS_MAIN is set (the default), it's time to vacuum the main
    relation.  Otherwise, we can skip this part.  If processing the TOAST
    table is required (e.g., PROCESS_TOAST is set), we'll force
    PROCESS_MAIN to be set when we recurse to the TOAST table so that it
    gets processed here.
How does that sound?
-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
		
	В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: