Re: add PROCESS_MAIN to VACUUM

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Nathan Bossart
Тема Re: add PROCESS_MAIN to VACUUM
Дата
Msg-id 20230306202734.GA3033389@nathanxps13
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: add PROCESS_MAIN to VACUUM  (Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: add PROCESS_MAIN to VACUUM  (Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 02:40:09PM -0500, Melanie Plageman wrote:
> I noticed in vacuum_rel() in vacuum.c where table_relation_vacuum() is
> called, 4211fbd84 changes the else into an else if [1]. I understand
> after reading the commit and re-reading the code why that is now, but I
> was initially confused. I was thinking it might be nice to have a
> comment mentioning why there is no else case here (i.e. that the main
> table relation will be vacuumed on the else if branch).

This was a hack to avoid another level of indentation for that whole block
of code, but based on your comment, it might be better to just surround
this entire section with an "if (params->options & VACOPT_PROCESS_MAIN)"
check.  WDYT?

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Melanie Plageman
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)
Следующее
От: Zheng Li
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Support logical replication of DDLs