Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
| От | Andres Freund |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20230216164408.bcatntzzxj3jqn3q@awork3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum (John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On 2023-02-16 16:22:56 +0700, John Naylor wrote: > On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 10:24 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> > > Right. TidStore is implemented not only for heap, so loading > > out-of-order TIDs might be important in the future. > > That's what I was probably thinking about some weeks ago, but I'm having a > hard time imagining how it would come up, even for something like the > conveyor-belt concept. We really ought to replace the tid bitmap used for bitmap heap scans. The hashtable we use is a pretty awful data structure for it. And that's not filled in-order, for example. Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: