Re: We shouldn't signal process groups with SIGQUIT

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Nathan Bossart
Тема Re: We shouldn't signal process groups with SIGQUIT
Дата
Msg-id 20230215181519.GA1353768@nathanxps13
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: We shouldn't signal process groups with SIGQUIT  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 10:12:58AM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2023-02-15 09:57:41 -0800, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> Oh, that's nifty.  Any reason not to enable send_abort_for_crash, too?
> 
> I think it'd be too noisy. Right now you get just a core dump of the crashed
> process, but if we set send_abort_for_crash we'd end up with a lot of core
> dumps, making it harder to know what to look at.
> 
> We should never need the send_abort_for_kill path, so I don't think the noise
> issue applies to the same degree.

Makes sense.

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Nathan Bossart
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Improve logging when using Huge Pages
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys