Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)
Дата
Msg-id 20230214190812.m43wjzgsxbijkm52@awork3.anarazel.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)  (Maciek Sakrejda <m.sakrejda@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2023-02-11 10:24:37 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> Just pushed the actual pg_stat_io view, the splitting of the tablespace test,
> and the pg_stat_io tests.

One thing I started to wonder about since is whether we should remove the io_
prefix from io_object, io_context. The prefixes make sense on the C level, but
it's not clear to me that that's also the case on the table level.

Greetings,

Andres Freund



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Force testing of query jumbling code in TAP tests
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_dump versus hash partitioning