Re: Weird failure with latches in curculio on v15
От | Nathan Bossart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Weird failure with latches in curculio on v15 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20230209002413.GA603595@nathanxps13 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Weird failure with latches in curculio on v15 (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: Weird failure with latches in curculio on v15
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 08:56:24AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 02:25:54PM -0800, Nathan Bossart wrote: >> These are all good points. Perhaps there could be a base archiver >> implementation that shell_archive uses (and that other modules could use if >> desired, which might be important for backward compatibility with the >> existing callbacks). But if you want to do something fancier than >> archiving sequentially, you could write your own. > > Which is basically the kind of things you can already achieve with a > background worker and a module of your own? IMO one of the big pieces that's missing is a way to get the next N files to archive. Right now, you'd have to trawl through archive_status on your own if you wanted to batch/parallelize. I think one advantage of what Robert is suggesting is that we could easily provide a supported way to get the next set of files to archive, and we can asynchronously mark them "done". Otherwise, each module has to implement this. -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: