Hi,
On 2023-01-23 19:45:19 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> > On 2023-01-23 17:51:46 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Yeah, I think that has enough other potential applications to be worth
> >> doing. Here's a quick draft patch (sans user-facing docs as yet).
> >> It injects any given values into postgresql.auto.conf, not
> >> postgresql.conf proper. I did that mainly because the latter looked
> >> beyond the abilities of the primitive string-munging code we have in
> >> there, but I think it can be argued to be a reasonable choice anyway.
>
> > Oh, I had thought we'd just pass them on with -c to the processes that initdb
> > starts. But perhaps just persisting them isn't a bad idea...
>
> It certainly seems to me that that would be the mainstream use-case,
> so why not fill in the file as the user probably wants? They can
> always change it. Also, as I mentioned, the expectation is that
> initdb will set up a known-working combination of settings; and
> we don't really know that if we leave off whatever was injected by
> "-c". In the case at hand, if we don't propagate "huge_pages = off"
> to the installed configuration, the server still won't work.
Yea, makes sense.
Greetings,
Andres Freund