On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 09:49:00PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2023-01-12 10:44:33 -0800, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> There's another "return" later on in this PG_TRY block. I wonder if it's
>> possible to detect this sort of thing at compile time.
>
> Clang provides some annotations that allow to detect this kind of thing. I
> hacked up a test for this, and it finds quite a bit of prolematic
> code.
Nice!
> plpython is, uh, not being good? But also in plperl, pltcl.
Yikes.
> ../../../../home/andres/src/postgresql/src/pl/tcl/pltcl.c:1830:1: warning: no_returns_in_pg_try 'no_returns_handle'
isnot held on every path through here [-Wthread-safety-analysis]
> }
> ^
> ../../../../home/andres/src/postgresql/src/pl/tcl/pltcl.c:1809:2: note: no_returns_in_pg_try acquired here
> PG_CATCH();
> ^
> ../../../../home/andres/src/postgresql/src/include/utils/elog.h:433:7: note: expanded from macro 'PG_CATCH'
> no_returns_start(no_returns_handle##__VA_ARGS__)
> ^
>
> Not perfect digestible, but also not too bad. I pushed the
> no_returns_start()/no_returns_stop() calls into all the PG_TRY related macros,
> because that causes the warning to point to block that the problem is
> in. E.g. above the first warning points to PG_TRY, the second to
> PG_CATCH. It'd work to just put it into PG_TRY and PG_END_TRY.
This seems roughly as digestible as the pg_prevent_errno_in_scope stuff.
However, on my macOS machine with clang 14.0.0, the messages say "mutex"
instead of "no_returns_in_pg_try," which is unfortunate since that's the
part that would clue me into what the problem is. I suppose it'd be easy
enough to figure out after a grep or two, though.
> Clearly this would need a bunch more work, but it seems promising? I think
> there'd be other uses than this.
+1
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com