Re: Transaction timeout
| От | Nathan Bossart |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Transaction timeout |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20230112192436.GA2106738@nathanxps13 обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Transaction timeout (Andrey Borodin <amborodin86@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Transaction timeout
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 12:53:31PM -0800, Andrey Borodin wrote:
> I've rewritten this part to correctly report all timeouts that did
> happen. However there's now a tricky comma-formatting code which was
> tested only manually.
I suspect this will make translation difficult.
>> > > > + ahprintf(AH, "SET transaction_timeout = 0;\n");
>> > >
>> > > Hm - why is that the right thing to do?
>> > Because transaction_timeout has effects of statement_timeout.
>>
>> I guess it's just following precedent - but it seems a bit presumptuous
>> to just disable safety settings a DBA might have set up. That makes some
>> sense for e.g. idle_in_transaction_session_timeout, because I think
>> e.g. parallel backup can lead to a connection being idle for a bit.
>
> I do not know. My reasoning - everywhere we turn off
> statement_timeout, we should turn off transaction_timeout too.
> But I have no strong opinion here. I left this code as is in the patch
> so far. For the same reason I did not change anything in
> pg_backup_archiver.c.
From 8383486's commit message:
We disable statement_timeout and lock_timeout during dump and restore,
to prevent any global settings that might exist from breaking routine
backups.
I imagine changing this could disrupt existing servers that depend on these
overrides during backups, although I think Andres has a good point about
disabling safety settings. This might be a good topic for another thread.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: