On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 09:41:47AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> I am not sure if I understand the problem you are trying to solve with
> this part of the patch. Are you worried that after we mark some of the
> relation's state as READY, all the table syncs are in the READY state
> but we will not immediately try to check the two_pahse stuff and
> probably the apply worker may sleep before the next time it invokes
> process_syncing_tables_for_apply()?
Yes.
> If so, we probably also need to
> ensure that table_states_valid is marked false probably via
> invalidations so that we can get the latest state and then perform
> this check. I guess if we can do that then we can directly move the
> restart logic to the end.
IMO this shows the advantage of just waking up the worker. It doesn't
change the apply worker's behavior besides making it more responsive.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com