On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 02:20:38PM +0300, Pavel Borisov wrote:
> Hi, Alexander!
>
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 13:48, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 11:51 AM Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 09:29, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jan 2, 2023 at 6:42 PM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 06:14:48PM +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> > > > > > I'm going to push this if no objections.
> > > > >
> > > > > I also suggest that meson.build should not copy regress_args.
> > > >
> > > > Good point, thanks.
> > > Nice, thanks!
> > > Isn't there the same reason to remove regress_args from meson.build in
> > > oat's test and possibly from other modules with runningcheck=false?
> >
> > This makes sense to me too. I don't see anything specific in oat's
> > regression test that requires setting regress_args.
> Yes, it seems so.
> Regress args in oat's Makefile are added as a response to a buildfarm
> issues by 7c51b7f7cc08. They seem unneeded to be copied into
> meson.build with runningcheck=false. I may mistake but it seems to me
> that removing regress_args from meson.build with runningcheck=false is
> just to make it neat, not for functionality. So I consider fixing it
> in pg_db_role_setting, oat, or both of them optional.
Right - my suggestion is to "uncopy" them from pg_db_role_setting, where
they serve no purpose, since they shouldn't have been copied originally.
On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 09:29:00AM +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 2, 2023 at 6:42 PM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 06:14:48PM +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> > > I'm going to push this if no objections.
> >
> > I also suggest that meson.build should not copy regress_args.
>
> Good point, thanks.
I should've mentioned that the same things should be removed from
Makefile, too...
--
Justin